Orin Leroy Moses

King Jesus Version Orin Leroy Moses

A Brief Synopsis of the contents of this critical New Testament book: This book embodies six timely innovations: 1) the creative collation of the three Synoptic gospels into a single all-inclusive narrative revealing all of the essential facts and details of the Gospel in one read; 2) aside from the Synoptics, a re-visitation of the New Testament Canon restricting epistolary content only to true apostolic authority as revealed in the writings of the Christian historian, Eusebius, that covered the 325 A. D. council of Nice disputes that were eventually settled later in 369 A. D.; 3) an expanded functionally literal translation without the truth cancelling effect of committees which rectifies 600 years of bad translator habits imposed upon the text; 4) a translation that is sourced in the Antioch/Byzantine tradition found in the Majority Greek Text, since the oldest and best attested text is not the oldest extant manuscript found, but the no longer existing manuscript that has had ample and sufficient time to produce the greatest number of witnessing descendants resembling itself; 5) the inclusive embodiment of my book, Primordial Consecution, which presents the recently discovered Shuffled Manuscript Theory, and which also presents for the first time in two millennia the corrected text of twelve New Testament documents where the originally separated and shuffled manuscript sections are restored to their original sequential order, rectifying all contextual aberrations caused by the first transcribers; 6) finally, this work presents an overall coherent end-time scenario resulting from a three-part critical refutation of the authorship and content of the book of Revelation, greatly un-complicating eschatology by restricting the end times to the combination of Matthew 24, Luke 21, Mark 13, First and Second Thessalonians and John chapter 6. The reader of this work will experience a timely, refreshing enlightenment of the soul, a liberation from the bondage of erroneous thinking and false doctrines, and a deliverance from the engendered confusion and inner perplexity that many have developed over much of what one encounters while reading the average New Testament today. They are all different. They are all called the word of God. Which one is right? Which books did the ancients fight against for canonization? This work - thirteen years in the making - is a self-sacrificial work of loving-care, freely done in order to provide the answer so that we can all get at/to the Truth. The E-Book edition of this is called, "A Believing Critic's Renovated Testament" under my pen name: Humilis Filius del Pater